Differences Between Organic and Mechanical Structures - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1796 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Economics Essay Type Compare and contrast essay Did you like this example? DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ORGANIC AND MECHANICAL STRUCTURES Organizational structures is very important for organizations because these structures create environment for to active the organizations. There are some differences between organic and mechanical structures. These differences has been found by Burns and Stalker. They are management scientist. They had searched relations between organizational design and environmental conditions. They organized interview to manager and office staff. They found these differences after their searching and interview. These differences are about environmental conditions. Mechanical structure more appropriate for places where have stagnant environmental conditions but organic structure not like that. Organic structure appropriate for places where environmental conditions change continuously. Mechanistic organizations are efficient, rigid, predictable, and standardized organization but organic organizations are flexible, adaptabl e, and team directed. Mechanical structure have classic management system properties. Specifically, mechanistic organizations are characterized by a rigid hierarchy; a heavy reliance on rules, policies, vertical specialization; centralized decision making, communications and narrowly defined tasks. Generally, mechanic structure has vicious cycle but organic structure suitable for productivity. Characteristics of Mechanical Structure Mechanical structure depends on the order and command relationships. This like a water company because water companies’ goals only product a bottle of water ideally. Water companies’s employees only focus on their one task. In mechanic structure relationships between members of the organization are vertical and formal. This can cause for some problem. For example top manager told task and how will done this to lower level person that task can be change until it goes to the lowest level. It can be big problem for a work. In a mechanica l structure administrators and managers interfere to every work and work is attached to the hub everytime. Work done for best and ideally. In mechanical structure administrators are responsible for works, problems or something. If there was a problem in a factory, admnistrator or manager is resbonsible because workers work detached from each other. Characteristics of Organic Structure In organic structure works done by workers’ relationships with each other. This like a film companies. Because film companies not only depend on one task or movie, they always create new something. For example, producers and other officials must be in information exchange because people want to new and orginal things from them everytime. In mechanical structure top manager told task and how will done this to lower level person that task can be change until it goes to the lowest level but in organic structure not like that. In Organic structures companies it not that way because in organ ic structure horizontal communication is valid. So persons be together usually and they be in communication everytime. They decide everything together. So tasks or something not change. In organic structure work is not attached to the hub and work not done good the good or best work is done. In organic structure works, everyone are resbonsible because they always be in communication for a work. They do works together or they decide something together not only manager rebonsible in this structure. For example a company is developing computer system. There is a group and they decided what they will do and they developed that. If that computer system has a problem this responsibility belongs to everyone because they decided together what they will do and what is true what is wrong. Differences Between These Structure Mechanical structures are mainly for companies that operate in a stable environment, use a centralized approach of authority, and maintain strong loyalty for managem ent. Organic structures are used in organizations facing unstable environments and must possess the ability to change accordingly. In the organic structures persons analyze, and distribute information and knowledge very quickly. This ensures that they stay competitive against other businesses. integrated with one another. Also, by implementing decentralized decision will help empower employees leading to greater creativity and better problem solving. I think organic structure more effectively for working organizations. Because, in mechanical structure communication contains only orders and reports. Organic structure agrees person’s special informations and working together. And organic structure hasn’t imperative things the structure has more information exchange so persons do their tasks and jobs more effectively. In the mechanical structure ‘’person to be expert in the field’’ this thing is more important but in the organic structure per sons can use their own speacial properties and informations. So organic structure more good and effectively for working. For example, there is a group of worker. They must repair a computer fan. If they know only about fans and they are proffessional fan repairmen they will repair only that fan but if they know about fan, about computer, and general technological things and if they can use these abilities and informations they will repair that fan and they can develop that fan, other computer fans or somethings about computer. So organic structure more good for working because group working, communication, special informations and abilities more helpful for working. Mechanical structure don’t let to persons for create more good job because in the mechanical structure managers only focus their task for best. In the organic structures persons, workers be able to creative. Mechanical structure has more production and efficiency its good for a job but the structure has more ce ntralization and formalization its not good i think. Because if centralization more less managers can use their own abilities and they can create more good job. In organic structure its possible because in organic structure formalization and centralization more less than mechanical structure. For example, If i was magazine editor in Level Magazine about games, i had would want to be organic structure in my office. Because magazine jobs are about communication. They must play games and search every new games together they have to write and think together what will they write and add new things for readers. Workers or writers must study together and they always must talk each other for their job. Writers must be talkative and creative already. If they don’t talk with people and not in communication they can’t write anything. But first they must talk each other of course. But my magazine’s factory must be in mechanical structure because they have to print my mag azine every month or week best. They must use their own properties and informations because they need common idea everytime. And in the work it must be low centralization, persons musn’t focus on central. If a manager want more productivity that job must be mechanical structure so workers must focus on only their tasks and jobs. They musn’t do anything other jobs and they musn’t create different things for their job. They musn’t use their own properties and their informations, in that job must be one knowledge manager. It must be more centralization and formalization for that job and product. Only top manager has every informations in the mechanical structure. I think organic structure more favorable and appropriate. Because, in my opinion, creativity and productivity is very or most important thing for work. If works conducted together they will be in communication and it will be good for relationships for people. Communication and relationship is most important thing for people and if they are good work will be good too. People’s brainstorms and communications will help and guide for find the best. In organic structure, people are independent so they can be better and develop themselves. In my opinion organic structure more democratic than mechanical structure. And people grow and develop themselves they will create new and more good more beneficial things. Of course mechanical structure good for some work for example product companies. Because they only need more product and they must be focus on center. They have only one task. Company create decision factory realize that decision. It is vicious circle. It like a relationship between dress company and factory. Dress company is creative and factory is manufecturer. For example Vans Company and Vans Factory. Vans dress company and workers follow fashion, look and search what kind of dress style people like and create different dress styles. So the company decide an d choose some of dress and factory start to product ideally. But factory can’t change these dress styles and something because they have to do only their work best. In this situation Vans Company has organic structure but Vans Factory has mechanical structure. Productivity is important for work. Being innovator is really important for work. In the mechanical structure workers only depend on their manager and they must be hanging on their job only. But I think workers must be innovator, they must be create more good job for productivity so again organic structure more favorable for working. If i had a company about electrical appliances and i had workers i would like they be i communication. I would like they are innovator because I wouldn’t want to product only same and good electrical appliance i would like to product different and more good more useful appliances. So if it will be possible my workers must be innovator, my workers musn’t depend on me and the y must product new and more good things everytime. In organic structure problems are solve together. For example there is a lamp and it is broken. If the responsibility be stuck to one man both would be a waste of time as well as reduced productivity. But if the responsibility be stuck to everyone and if they study together that problem will be solved more quickly and maybe they will find something new. I think hardware companies and factories are really good example for these differences. Hardware factories have a mechanical structure. In hardware factories workers work same time everyday and they do same things. In these factories the workers take order, they apply and do that. For example, their task is producting pink mause, they have to do them in their shift time. Hardware factories produce only what is requested so they have a mechanical structure. But hardware companies and other staff everytime must create something and they don’t work at certain times. For exa mple a hardware factory product keyborads. That hardware company must be create new keyboards for to attract attention and gain. And in that hardware company workers work together for best innovation. Hardware companies’ goals is innovation and creativity. In hardware factories administrators and managers interfere to every work and work is attached to the hub everytime. In hardware factories, workers do their work for best and ideally. Managers control and manage their workers and work. In hardware companies work is not attached to the hub because work is depends on counseling and supporting. They study something in groups and decide together. In that companies workers do the best job and develop them. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Differences Between Organic and Mechanical Structures" essay for you Create order

Analysis Of Othello And Iago - 1463 Words

Self-Awareness Self-awareness is the â€Å"conscious knowledge of one s own character, feelings, motives, and desires†(Merriam-Webster). Self-awareness is key when it comes to understanding ones’ self in relationship to ones actions and reality. Perspective, which is a personal point of view that comes from the self, is what shapes the reality that one interacts with. So it is the self, and one’s relationship with the self that truly determines and ones’ actions and view of the world. Don Quixote is an excellent example of how one’s perspective and self-awareness are important. In this story a man sets out on his own adventure to right the wrongs of the world. However, in spite of noble intentions, this â€Å"hero† ends up causing much more harm then needed because he is not self-aware and has a different perspective than everyone else. In the play Othello many characters have the same issue with perspective and self-awareness. Othello and Ia go are the two main characters that allow their views on themselves to take control over their actions without their awareness. There is a tragic ending to this play and it was all because of differing perspectives and lack of self-awareness. The Bhagavad-Gita discusses the importance of the Self and how one must find ways to shape and understand the self for the better. Through these three pieces one can see and how perspective changes everything and the importance of the self with awareness to it. Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes wasShow MoreRelatedThe Character Analysis Of Iago Of Othello1075 Words   |  5 PagesAt first glance, Iago of Othello can appear to have little motivation for his destructive tendencies; however, when viewed through the lens of antisocial personality disorder, his incentive takes on a twisted internal logic. His all-consuming desire for revenge is not necessarily because of any outside influence by Othello himself, but rather the fact that Othello dis rupts Iago’s conception of himself and is a pawn whom he can manipulate for pleasure. His arrogance and entitlement are also classicRead MoreOthello - Iago Character Analysis Essay772 Words   |  4 PagesIago, in Shakespeares Othello, is a deceiving character because he tells lies in order to get what he wants. He interacts with people only to manipulate them, but most importantly he never reveals his true feelings or motives. Iago might say things that suggest what his motive is, but he soon contradicts himself with another suggestion making it extremely difficult to understand him. Although Iagos true motives cannot be determined, some motives could be jealousy, the enjoyment of seeing peopleRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of Iago In William Shakespeares Othello705 Words   |  3 PagesKarla Morales GRASP 10/23/17 Iago is the most interesting character in Othello, by William Shakespeare. With his carefully thought out plans, he is able to manipulate others to do things in a way that helps him and moves him closer towards what in his mind is revenge against Othello. He is the main antagonist in this play, pushing Othello and everyone else towards their end. Iago manages to commit all seven deadly sins. He constantly uses his good reputation for dishonorable purposes. His talentRead MoreOthello: Good vs Evil1525 Words   |  7 PagesGood Or Evil: A Critical Analysis of Othello’s Main Characters William Shakespeare’s Othello is a classic depiction of a struggle between good and evil. In the play,, the characters are faced with the choice to either conquer or succumb to the overpowering force of evil. Shakespeare places his characters on a sort of spectrum in which a character’s amount of god or evil can be represented by a shade of color: black representing pure evil, white representing absolute goodness, and a shade of greyRead MoreTheme Of Jealousy In Othello979 Words   |  4 Pagesof this is in Othello by William Shakespeare, it is shown Iago is infuriated with that fact that Othello is in the upper class while he is stuck in the lower class. A Marxist analysis is shown here because Iago does everything in his power to convince the other characters he should have a higher position. Jealousy comes a long way it started before shakespeares time and is still here today. The thought of being jealous can be dreadful and can hurt those all around you. In Othello jealousy is presentRead MoreTragic Hero in Othelo by William Shakespeare996 Words   |  4 PagesConventions of Othello Shakespeare has been a part of the American Society for many years. Compared to other Authors, he has a different style of writing but within his own writings, they are all very much alike. He has written many plays including Othello and Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare was a man who wrote plays that followed the same literary conventions. These conventions included tragic hero, fallacy, irony, and also suspense. A tragic hero is a male figure who is high in society and one whoRead MoreAnalysis Of Shakespeare s Othello 1131 Words   |  5 PagesAn Analysis of Othello by Shakespeare Shakespeare is known for his use of recurring themes throughout his work, including love, death and betrayal. These themes are present in his work of Othello. However, the most fundamental issue is jealousy. The lives of the characthers in Othello are ruined by jealousy from the beginning to the end of the play. The telling of the story is carried out by passion, jealousy, and death. Shakespeare’s Othello reveals devastating tragic inevitability, stunning psychologicalRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Othello And Othello Essay1282 Words   |  6 PagesOthello speaks to Iago in Act Three of the play saying, â€Å"certain, men should be what they seem† (3.3.131). This excerpt foreshadow events in which Othello will begin to question the actions and morality of Cassio and Desdemona, all orchestrated by Iago’s scheming nature. This is a very important concept to showcase because Othello devoutly loves Desdemona and trusts Cassio until conniving language from Iago cause s him to think otherwise. Drawing on Shakespeare’s source story by Cinthio and otherRead MoreSedgwick s Homosocial Continuum Of William Shakespeare s Othello849 Words   |  4 PagesShakespeare’s Othello Where does it end? Where did it begin? On a continuum, it is impossible to distinguish. Eve Sedgwick coined the idea of the â€Å"Homosocial continuum.† Her argument involves gender, class, and hierarchical relationships. In William Shakespeare’s, Othello, many character pairings can be analyzed in relation to Sedgwick’s theories. The relationships that most interestingly relate to the homosocial continuum are Desdemona and Emilia, Iago and Roderigo, and Iago and Othello. FirstRead MoreOthello Analysis838 Words   |  4 PagesOthello Analysis Othello is a story of jealousy and manipulation. The story of a man who believes that he deserves to have everything he wants. If anything gets in the way he may ridicule, manipulate or even fight to move it. Othello uses several different types of elements in the drama. Symbolism, Irony and Conflict are all elements that can be found in Othello. We will discuss each in detail later in the essay. The audience views characters in Othello in many different ways especially when

Fin515 Wk 4 Free Essays

7-2 – Boehm Incorporated is expected to pay a $1. 50 per share dividend at the end of this year (i. e. We will write a custom essay sample on Fin515 Wk 4 or any similar topic only for you Order Now , D1 = $1. 50). The dividend is expected to grow at a constant rate of 7% a year. The required  rate of return  on the stock, rs, is 15%. What is the value per share of Boehm’s stock? D1= $1. 50 per share g = 7% rs= 15% What is the value of a share of Boehm Stock? P^0 =    D1 /(rs – g) P^0 =    1. 50/(0. 15-0. 07) P^0 =    $18. 75 7-4 – Nick’s Enchiladas Incorporated has preferred stock outstanding that pays a dividend of $5 at the end of each year. The preferred sells for $50 a share. What is the stock’s required rate of return? Dividend = $5 Preferred    = $50 What is the stock’s required rate of return ^P 0 = D/rs rs = D/^P 0 rs = 5/50 rs = 0. 10 or 10% 7-5 – A company currently pays a dividend of $2 per share (D0 = $2). It is estimated that the company’s dividend will grow at a rate of 20% per year for the next 2 years, then at a constant rate of 7% thereafter. The company’s stock has a beta of 1. 2, the risk- free rate is 7. 5%, and the market risk premium is 4%. What is your estimate of the stock’s current price? D0 = $2. 00 g = 20% for 2 years g = 7% there after Bi = 1. 2 Rf = 7. 5% RPm = 4% Rs = Rf +(bi* RPm) Rs = 7. 5 +(1. 2*4) Rs = 12. 3 What is your estimate of the stock’s current price? D0 $2. 00 g0 to 1 20. 0% g1 to 2 20. 0% gn 7. 0% rs 12. 3% Year 1 2 D1 D2 Expected dividends $2. 40 $2. 88 Expected P2 $58. 14 PV of expected dividends $4. 42 PV of expected P2 $46. 10 Expected P0 $50. 53 Problems (p. 371) 9-2 After-Tax Cost of Debt LL Incorporated’s currently outstanding 11% coupon bonds have a yield to maturity of 8%. LL believes it could issue new bonds at par that would provide a similar yield to maturity. If its marginal tax rate is 35%, what is LL’s after-tax cost of debt? After Tax cost of debt = rd * (1- tx rate) 0. 08 * (1 – 0. 35) = 0. 08 * (0. 65) = 0. 052 Answer: 5. 2% 9-4 Cost of Preferred Stock with Flottion Costs Burnwood Tech plans to issue some $60 par preferred stock with a 6% dividend. A similar stock is selling on the market for $70. Burnwood must pay flotation costs of 5% of the issue price. What is the cost of the preferred stock? E= Dividend/ (Market price-Flotation Costs)=(60/6)/(70-(70X0. 05)=0. 0541=5. 41 Answer: 5. 41% 9-5 Cost of Equity – DCF Summerdahl Resorts’ common stock is currently trading at $36 a share. The stock is expected to pay a dividend of $3. 0 a share at the end of the year (D1 _ $3. 00), and the dividend is expected to grow at a constant rate of 5% a year. What is the   cost of common equity? P0 = $36; D1 = $3. 00; g = 5%; rs = ? rs = D1/P0+g=(3/36)+0. 05=0. 01333 Answer: 13. 33% 9-6 Cost of Equity – CAPM Booher Book Stores has a beta of 0. 8. The yield on a 3-month T-bill is 4% and t he yield on a 10-year T-bond is 6%. The market risk premium is 5. 5%, and the return on an average stock in the market last year was 15%. What is the estimated cost of common equity using the CAPM? rs = rRF + bi(RPM) = 0. 06 + 0. 8(0. 55) = 0. 14 Answer: 10. 4% 9-7 WACC Shi Importers’ balance sheet shows $300 million in debt, $50 million in preferred stock, and $250 million in total common equity. Shi faces a 40% tax rate and the following data: rd _ 6%, rps _ 5. 8%, and rs _ 12%. If Shi has a target capital structure of 30% debt, 5% preferred stock, and 65% common stock, what is Shi’s WACC? 30% Debt; 5% Preferred Stock; 65% Equity; rd = 6%; T = 40%; rps = 5. 8%; rs = 12%. WACC = (wd)(rd)(1 – T) + (wps)(rps) + (wce)(rs) WACC = 0. 30(0. 06)(1-0. 40) + 0. 05(0. 058) + 0. 65(0. 12) = 0. 0917 Answer: 9. 17% How to cite Fin515 Wk 4, Essay examples

Imagery In Barn Burning Essay Example For Students

Imagery In Barn Burning Essay Barn BurningAs Barn Burning opens, an adolescent boy named Sartoris Snopes is in court, hoping he will not have to testify in the arson case against his father a charge of which Sarty knows Mr. Snopes is absolutely guilty. The judge, whom Sarty perceives as kindly, is nonetheless Sartys enemy because he is his fathers enemy, and Sarty has not yet separated himself from his father. Sartys family are itinerant farmers, but they move around even more often than is typical because of his fathers habit of burning something down every time he gets angry. Sarty realizes that there is something deeply psychologically wrong with his father, but he underestimates his fathers danger. When they arrive at the beautiful plantation of Major de Spain, therefore, Sarty feels the de Spains are safe: People whose lives are a part of this peace and dignity are behind his touch, he no more to them than a buzzing wasp: capable of stinging for a little moment but thats all; the spell of this peace and dignity rendering even the barns and stable and cribs which belong to it impervious to the puny flames he might contrive. Sarty does not know that his father can just as easily bring down a big plantation as a cow barn. It would be easy to say that Sartoris, in the end, must make a choice between right and wrong, between the peace and dignity represented by the de Spains with the squalor and misery of the Snopes family, but it is more than that. At the storys beginning, when Sarty was ready to testify that his father did not burn down that barn, he would have done it because a sons job is to stick to his father. At the storys end, he warns Major de Spain that his father is about to burn down his beautiful plantation, even though he knows that this will bring his family down once and for all, even though he knows that this means he will never be able to go home again. This is heavy knowledge for a boy but Sarty is able to do it because he now sees that he is not his father, and the route he wants to travel in the world is nothing like his fathers path.